www.educationalpolicy.org
The Week in Review
spacer image Image Spacer
| Forward to a Friend | Printer Friendly |
Recent Publications
Dr. Watson Scott Swail, President & CEO

Welcome to the New America

July 11, 2008

Watson Scott Swail, President & CEO, Educational Policy Institute

I did some fact checking this morning, and, as of yesterday, the average gallon of gas in the US cost $4.11. That’s over a dollar higher than a year ago and almost three times the price of regular unleaded in 2003. Even at our previous peak during the Iran crisis in 1979, gas was only $3.41 in equivalent dollars. (SOURCES: http://zfacts.com; www.gasbuddy.com). Our readers in California and other select places will surely notice that their gas rates are much higher: in the range of $4.50 gallon. Only two years ago we were mystified at $70/barrel. The US price on July 3 hit a record $143/barrel, and analysts are predicting $200/barrel by year end.

Of course, gas isn’t the only consumable rising. Basic food staples, such as flour and rice, which held steady for most of the past decade, have risen approximately 70 percent over the past year. Some shoppers may not be noticing the price hit as much, but the astute shopper has certainly noticed that the packaging of most goods, beyond produce, has shrunk significantly over the last year. So, while prices haven’t necessarily changed, the price per unit has—dramatically.

The net result of this recent activity is an increase in the average monthly Inflation rate of 4+ percent this year, double that of 2002. And not to pile on, but the housing market in the US is in the tank. The average home price has dropped from $250,000 to $200,000 since 2006,a 20-percent reduction. Again, in certain areas, homeowners would lust for only a 20-percent reduction.

So, what does this have to do with education?

Everything. As most analysts and policymakers clearly understand, when the economy goes south, so does funding for education, whether we focus on K-12 or postsecondary education. For us policy wonks, we have to use generalizations and historical data to show the impact of the economy on education, because data of this type are backlogged compared to other data such, as gas, food, and other CPI-related data.

Historically, we know that education is significantly hit during a recession (and yes, we’re in a recession). States are already starting to feel the pain.

For instance, on NPR this morning, Larry Abramson spoke exactly of this issue in terms of the toll that our economy is taking on education funding. Abramson noted that 22 Michigan districts are facing deficits this year, resulting in major staff layoffs. A representative of the Michigan Association of School Boards said that the first to go are the young, somewhat untenured teachers, who cost, in many cases, 50 percent of what senior teachers are paid. I can’t argue with this action, but you do lose potentially twice as many staff in this type of across-the-board sweep, resulting in a reduction in services to students and certainly an impact on learning outcomes.

Higher education is not immune to the economy, and perhaps is even more subject to the ebb and flow of state and federal funding compared to K-12. Institutions of all types continue to increase their prices at 2-3 or even 4 times inflation, but state funding is the next shoe to fall. California has already cut their higher education funding by 10 percent across-the-board, and other states are or will follow.

Without trying to sound like Chicken Little, education is in for a big hit, I’m afraid. I say this because we’ve seen this train too many times. Education isn’t quite the entitlement people think it is, and even if it doesn’t get cut in the budget, there is a tendency to let it stagnate for years during and after a recession, which essentially is a budget cut when inflation is considered.

Education is falling into the same problem as health care; it is getting more expensive to provide public and private schooling for students at all levels of education, and the resources are getting much tougher to attain.

Understanding that we know that this is the reality, and similarly knowing that this trend has been evolving for some time, I remain dismayed that we seem to be doing little or nothing about it. I’m not seeing the blue ribbon panels on public school funding, or state funding. I’ve seen a few on containing college costs, but they were trees in the forest, for all intent, because they resulted in no pressure on policymakers. The choir can only do so much.

Thus, we need a new conversation in America. We need to have real, sustained converations with education officials to try and build a more stable and sustainable funding system. We need leadership on this issue, and the leadership is fairly mute at the current time. Perhaps we cna do something about it. Keep in touch.

On this note, please have a nice weekend, and don't use your credit card.

 

Ps. Did I mention that the national debt is currently at $9.5 trillion?

 

 

The Educational Policy Institute is an international non-profit think tank dedicated to the study of educational opportunity. The Week in Review is a weekly publication that highlights the top news stories, reports and statistics related to academic preparation and access and success in the US, Canada, and beyond. The publication also features a commentary written by either President Watson Scott Swail, EdD or Vice-President Alex Usher.

To submit comments, news releases, or submissions, please email Dr. Watson Scott Swail at wswail@educationalpolicy.org or call (757) 430-2200.

 
 
Image Spacer
stat of the week
   

 
stat of the week
   

No Merit in these Scholarships (2005, June)

Fay Vincent

Sustaining science

This first edition of EPI's Policy Perspectives was written by Mr. Fay Vincent, a former Major League Baseball Commissioner and University Trustee. Mr. Vincent, a Yale law graduate and a former trustee at Williams College, Carleton College, and Fairfield University, takes a look at the escalating issue of increased merit-based aid in lieu of aid to deserving students from low-income families. “To my mind, merit-based aid betrays the original goal of helping worthy but disadvantaged students," says Vincent."It spends donors’ money in a way they may not intend, and it invests college resources in short-term promotional advantage instead of lasting improvements of substance.”

 
stat of the week
   

 

 

 
Click here to sign up for EPI News
spacer image

EDUCATIONALPOLICY.ORG



SUBSCRIBE TO EPI EPI